Why I like Roam over Bear for improving my thinking
This note is part of a small series highlighting my digital ecosystem.
While I’ve been using Bear for note taking and writing for years—and even wrote about how Bear is for networked thinking—there’s something about diving deeper into exploring “networked thought” that really calls to me. While Bear has the ability to cross-link individual notes, Roam goes so much deeper and thus makes the ability to build upon and improve ideas that much easier.
Here are some recent thoughts of mine after immersing myself in Roam for a few weeks.
1. Roam shows you, on a single page, all the possible connections to the concept you’re currently thinking about.
- Whether you thought to link content together or it never crossed your mind, if there is a mention of keywords, that content will be resurfaced for your consideration. That’s powerful.
2. Roam makes it easy to manage what you’re looking at by providing toggle dropdowns to expand and collapse content.
- While Bear is definitely a less distracting writing environment, Roam’s toggle dropdowns make dismissing irrelevant content a breeze, which might be a more valuable feature. This really helps focus.
3. The value of Roam is its automatic bi-directional note linking and block-level embedding. The value of Bear is its beauty, privacy, and mobile app.
4. In Bear, a wiki link takes you to a page that includes whatever you write in that note. In Roam, a wiki link takes you to a page that references every mention of that phrase across every word in the system.
- Roam lets you see relationships between notes that previously went undetected, which sparks the human mind to make new connections and boost creativity. That’s powerful.
With all that being said, I’m wondering if it is a disservice to use both Roam and Bear at the same time with similar levels of activity. I truly love Bear, but I don’t know if they can co-exist in the same system, as that reduces the value that comes from networked thinking.
Based on my short time using Roam, I very quickly came to believe that the more words you put in Roam, the more useful the software becomes, because the more content there is to connect, collide, and spark novel ideas.
Throwing all of my ideas in one big bowl and letting them mix around pays immense dividends.
By choosing to put some content in Bear or any other app, whatever that content may be, it will not be in Roam and thus will not be able to generate compound interest on your thoughts, notes, and ideas.
Roam helps you build compound interest with your words and ideas. In essence, Roam helps you think. Does Bear help you think?
The value of Roam is the way it facilitates thinking, which helps improve ideas by forging collisions and connections the mind might not see on its own.
Bear can do this as well, but it does not provide as much serendipity as Roam, which I think might be the key: Roam creates serendipity and collision of ideas.
This influx of cross-linking, dynamic referencing, and the linkable chaos that these apps create feel, to me, like something entirely new, and that bell is not going to get unrung.
So where does that leave me?
Using both Bear and Roam of course, until I either give in to the appeal of Roam, or find a way for the two to work for me in harmony.
I made this site to learn through discourse. Your thoughts here👇 or on Twitter are encouraged!